A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving prospective neighbours above the development of a wall at a coastal web page in a very north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national focus adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family household at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods post about René Collier and the Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has evolved into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, look for to create their household house. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of recognized people. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their possible neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted below organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their arranging permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Particular Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore regions are topic to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, particularly in the sensitive coastal natural environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly constructed, is in the correct placement. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their look at, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has considering that develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence in the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from your sea Irish Times reported, describing how the two men entered the drinking water throughout extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website turned one of the most striking descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar Paul Feely accountant with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second within the legal timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and situations attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A personal watch, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few merely seeking to create a spouse and children residence in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Particular Place of Conservation and say that all performs have been carried out determined by professional suggestions and accredited plans. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about development of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description to get a circumstance that lots of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier observed the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly unique Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have become synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via midsection-higher h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded through waistline-superior water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both the Bodily fact of your coastline as well as the symbolic character of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome stays uncertain. The court docket will have to figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell along with each other extensive once the authorized fees have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development performs at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case increase over and above that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.