A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving prospective neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated national interest pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children dwelling at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of arranging breaches, environmental issues, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Times article about René Collier plus the Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has advanced into a extremely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development performs at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, seek out to build their loved ones home. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, in which advancement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven people. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being made by their possible neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted under arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their setting up permission by creating a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on the Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result spots are matter to rigid controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have Long lasting ecological outcomes, notably inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that's partly created, is in the proper position. Their lawful team has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their watch, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both of those hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular attempts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced from the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods, a picture that has due to the fact turn out to be emblematic of your depth of your dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they were meant to gather visual evidence with the wall’s posture relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Instances described, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the h2o through significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm water to photograph the location turned Among the most hanging descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were included in detail because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as readers sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to further submissions on whether or not interim orders need to be granted to halt building pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute in the legal timeline.
With the core on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain that the wall, as manufactured, goes over and above what was approved and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental security and adherence to preparing law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A personal view, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their long-standing relationship to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few simply seeking to build a spouse and children home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one is effective have been performed dependant on Qualified guidance and permitted plans. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including coming into the sea through a storm, will not alter the underlying points.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how arranging disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a problem that numerous observers see as ever more widespread. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation between private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier noted that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in regional advocacy on preparing and environmental concerns, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from very unique Qualified backgrounds can find on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site in the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via midsection-large h2o during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods and René Collier waded by means of waistline-higher h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting both equally the physical fact of the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be uncertain. The court docket must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Particular Region of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling disorders. Nonetheless the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside each other extensive following the lawful fees happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building performs at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, however the implications of the situation prolong over and above that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the significance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition, it underscores how rapidly a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental problems including environmental protection and property legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a spot of natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful thoughts. No matter if it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable carry on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.